Fanil Fayzullin Biography

Knowing a student who fascinates the student at the sea, TZ passed him a candidate minimum at the time ... He takes the exam at first glance tough, but in fact, he asked the questions not so complicated, more because of the fear that he was the head. Some kind wishes even spoke after the exam when he announced the assessments. I also heard that according to the number of candidates and doctors of sciences protected under his leadership, he has no equal in the republic ...

respect Fanil Saitovich to you !!! He is known not only in Russia, but abroad. And where you saw an abuse of a person and that he was constantly invited to abroad. In fact, he takes the exam very tactfully. And then, indeed, we must develop, in the end, more read more, for example, classics, and try to understand philosophy, and not to cram. I passed him an entrance exam in graduate school at 5.

Everyone knows the behavior of Fayzullin on entrance exams to graduate school. His first question: “What department are you going to? And the quality of your answer and your knowledge does not bother anyone at all. I beg you, this practice has existed for more than a dozen years. And I gave only one example, only about the exams. I’ll just keep silent about the rest, in my opinion, only the government notes ..

Yes, and even you:- And the rest, apparently, have not yet grown up to understanding the so reliably hidden political correctness and professional qualifications of this academician:- Tz Fanil Saitovich is one of the most authoritative people not only in the bastard, but also in the Higher School of Bashkortostan. Thank you for your contribution and work in the development of a philosopher and a sociological school.

It is a pity that our mediocre leadership of the republic does not notice such prominent people! And neglecting this fact would be very unreasonable. And at the department he has no one by nationality. Who gives him - wrap it on a mustache. He himself said that he did not conduct lectures there. And seminars. So all the authors of garbage reviews are undersed.

It is necessary to write about him in that university where he conducts lectures. And to praise or take accounts - the loss of time all if you had support from sociologists, you would be eaten by philosophers. By the way, Bolshisnby, writing here, just had the honor of being familiar with the characterized subject, that is, with the one who supported you. And about nationality - you must be a happy exception.

But I fight about the laying that the processes that you consider in the dissertation were studied exclusively in the territory of Bashkortostan, which, for sure, was reflected in the topic of work:- Tz if you do not know a person have nothing to write about him all kinds of dirt! Personally, I would not have without his participation and honesty of work, nor position, nor degree of defense of me with pleasure “Friends” from the Department of Sociology.

He did not give. More is necessary in our education system of such people! And the person and specialist is better than you all together !!!!!!!!! By the way, I am not Bashkirs, and for four years of communication I have never felt at his department! And not at all because someone treats someone well. Country in the world "science" is not played. Unfortunately. So you should not sedge.

Yes, he is an unconditionally deserved, talented scientist, researcher. He says that students do not respect him, do not greet him, do not pass forward, but he himself does not respect others. He behaves frankly in a prickly. The appeal is “my dear” to the person whom he sees for the first time, and who came to his exam, and not drink tea, for him - the norm.

And it seems - a philosopher, a specialist in subtle matters, it seems to be a well -mannered person .. Does it matter who he is?! No need to talk about his personal qualities, we all know who is personally familiar with him or are simply familiar, on this subject there is a personal opinion of each of us! It has its own opinion on every serious issue. Judging by his performances on TV, it is ahead of events, the trends of the current story are catching on the go.

What causes dissatisfaction less thoughtful. Legal, moreover. To whom the hunt to see that there are people who think faster than you and look forward for a long period of time. And what loves his small nation is a world tendency - this is when the peoples of the world enter into capitalism in the mass of soy. After all, when Kap -M begins, the idea of ​​Lenin - the right of nations to self -determination comes to the fore.

That's when the cap is tired of building - then immediately the ideas of self -determination will die. America is already tired of this idea - they have no nations. Everything is "pleasantly dark -skinned" there. Not white and not black. And all kinds of ilk-oxy assholes. And the overwhelming, bruised African Americans, our Rasysky elite also builds not a cap-m, but something else.

In vain they want to include RB in the Orenburg region. And Tatarstan - in the Ulyanovsk region. We have a cap of reforms do not go. Can anyone say? Of those who are smarter and what will America tell us? .. It is impossible to convince him of something! And the philosopher Textbook is his 3-languid youngest academician: but I have not heard something about the philosopher Fayzullin anywhere except in Ufa the generator of ideas.

He pulls everything and all, many people owe him, but they do not value this. He pulls the whole department with the teachers on his shoulders.Everything breaks through, is always busy, but open for communication. Not like an ostrich in the sand does not hide his head. Although of course it would be softer. What is the angry of those who are from the word "nationality" in the eyes of goosebumps?

On the subject, yes, he takes exams strictly, but fair. Although, of course, he throws so much information that he quickly flies out of his head. Less it is necessary. Our heads need a beret. After all, they are our bright future all the more so much in passports the national column sent Nach, although she didn’t call him loudly, I probably screamed louder: tz he spoiled a lot of blood to people.

Screaming communist Tz.