Biography analysis 1
I would fight with: those who use the still unknown technique in gastronomic preferences to Orochimaru Kishimoto made direct references to snakes: beloved food: eggs and why not chicks ... unloved food: cold food, therefore, to the brilliant idea of Jiraiya with the purchase of fruit ice for Sasuke-kun, he did not reach his beloved: “Orochimaru:“ Orochimaru I studied biological cells of representatives of different clans.
Their samples are stored in his shelter ”character: ambitious, cruel, egocentric. In general, it seems to me that Buki is an interesting thing in the case of poorly open or more or less unambiguous characters. When it comes to complex and ambiguous characters, the reading of the beech can end with the burning of the ass, because often in the text an ambiguous character is either greasy from Itachi, Conan, timid Nagato, etc., or degrades to a primitive villain from children's comics.
You guess what awaits us? That's right, the second option. Kishima deliberately selectively selectively commented on the actions of Orochimaru: for example, we see that he notes how the hero attacked someone, but at the same time the author does not comment on the frame in which Orochimaru, say, is crying, attacking the teacher, he also does not comment on the Orochimaru and how Orochimaro stopped Anko from suicide and other impaired moments his biographies.
Therefore, I personally were not very interested in reading the beeches, but I noted for myself various curious phrases that can be beautifully inserted with quotes into paragraphs. Also, I think, some other excerpts from the databocks will be left for the following paragraphs. The chronology of biography events [Part 1] The professors of nickelled studies are known that there is no thing more mowal, inaccurate and unsuccessful in Naruto than a chronology with dates.
The fact that Kishimoto has problems with numbers is a dear soul that remains only to accept. I understand him so well ... Those who have already plunged into the ocean of pain claim that when trying to somehow adequately build and systematize chronology in Naruto, daredevil can wait for hallucinations, exacerbation of chronic diseases, nonsense, temperature, tremor, diarrhea and other consequences, unless, of course, you are most seriously taken for this business, and not like it.
So that you understand what I'm talking about, there is a vivid example with our same Orochimaru. When Sasuke leaves Konoha, Payne collects all Akatski, and there they say that Orochimaru left the organization 7 years ago, although we know that only 5 years ago Itachi entered this zoological circle, and he, in fact, expelled the snake from there. The same error is repeated in Om Tome when Kisame finds out that Sasuke killed Orochimaru, and says that Orochimaru left the organization 10 years ago.
But 10 years ago, Itachi had not even helped in Suicide Shisui, he was just accepted in the ANBU. Seeing that in the 4th Buk there are events with precisely affected dates, I was delighted, deciding that this would help me a lot. But unfortunately, having begun to consider these dates, I saw that they had a large one there several times, and in general, we can come to the conclusion that again we turn on the rule “that which looks adequate, we consider, but what is not is not”.
I tried to somehow systematize the available data, but, of course, not only was there masochism, so on, it is also a clear suicide: the resulting results are so unobvious and vary with generally accepted ideas that, without any proceedings, they will cause combatization from some people. I imagine what I have, although it should be remembered that I can supplement or change something in this scheme in the course of writing the remaining paragraphs.
This scheme has two types of chronology: on the left is the age of Orochimaru, on the right years before and after the birth of Naruto, as in our world, the chronology comes from the Christmas of Christ. You can also see the era of wars on the right: the first, second, third, the events unrelated with the life of Orochimaru were also added for a better understanding of parallels in the history of the plot.
Silers next to years, for example, "DB" are deciphered as follows: "4 Databuk, page." The numbers in square brackets are sent, respectively, for example, on the black background below. The episode "Escape from the village" branches to the number 37 and 38, because it is not clear whether he escaped to 37, or was it refreshed in memory? Now we can move on to a more detailed consideration of the biography of Orochimaru.
My childhood could say “here we don’t know anything, so we won’t say anything”, but we will not suit us such an option, so we make a little bit that we have! At the age of six [DB1], Orochimaru graduated from the Academy, captured the third bell and became the same student who is always put in an example. At an unknown point in time, his parents die, and it is believed that this was the strong imprint on him.
Also in childhood, Orochimaru uses a speech normal for the boy and even communicates with the third on "you". But growing up, he acquires a certain mannerism, we will analyze this in a paragraph about speech. Sannin's childhood was not revealed more. And then?And then - the war war and the shinobi system - literally what we created Orochimar as we saw him in the first season. Looking at the scheme of chronology, we see that the first event with Orochimaru, which is available to us after his childhood, is the death of Navaki, brother of Tsunade.
This episode itself is already the embodiment of all complexity, ambiguity of the character. As I indicated in the diagram, the age of Orochimaru at the time of this event is unknown. We only know that Navaki died at the age of 12. But how much Sannina is older than Navaki is unclear. His monologue itself is very unusual. It is clear that trying to interpret his words and facial expressions is how to hang a guillotine over himself, because everyone sees something of his own in Orochimaru: someone is an absolute psychopath, and someone is a person with a complex system of values that is still there.
But I have nothing to lose, and, moreover, you came here precisely in order to read my interpretations, and to agree with them or not is everyone’s business. At the first frame, I personally see bitterness in some way. Yes, I have already met countrshguments against this opinion: “just such a drawing,” “just such a pose.” I agree that the drawing of Kishimoto faces sometimes gives the characters rather strange, obscure emotions.
Anything can be. Then let's look at the other existing facts: Orochimaru removed the gift of Navaki from the body of Navaki to give it to Tsunade, and when she resorts, he holds the necklace in his hand. Hardly such actions are inherent in really indifferent, completely cold people.
The fact that I can say with confidence about Orochimar: he is not indifferent. And when I say this, I mean the fact that he really watches people around, their actions, feelings. He not only watches what is happening, but also participates in it: for example, takes a necklace, waits for Tsunade to express his thoughts to her. And these thoughts are caustic, poisonous, like a bite of a black mamba.
They are permeated with a sarcastic mockery - bitter, offensive. As if behind the screen of words, he judges someone: Tsunade, the Tsunade system “played the older sister”, giving his brother a gift and pleasing to him, but not really teaching the most important thing: to run away from danger, as, for example, Itachi taught Sasuke, although Tsunade tried to convey this thought to Navaki, which was visible immediately, she heard his refusal.
And the system, in principle, allows you to send children to the war. And the system does not provide doctors in the war. These words affect the tsunade - and she becomes a doctor, forces the leadership to change the method of forming the detachment, adding Iryninov to it. I will add again that my interpretation is subjective - the Trinity of Amegakura will not be superfluous to the next event with Orochimaru again shows us his extraordinary system of moral values: here Orochimaru is 26 years old.
It reminds me of how wounded horses or even just seriously wounded opponents were used to kill me. This action even has a name: "Blow of mercy." Let's focus on the motivation of this act by our now proclaimed Sannin. Is it cruelty and psychopathy? No, Orochimaru, as for me, hates hypocrisy. At the same time, I urge you not to make hasty conclusions that I am trying to justify it, call it good and impose - no.
I simply consider specifically these situations that seem ambiguous and can be interpreted not only from a negative point of view. The real tin begins on. Unambiguous tin. However, even here we will analyze his motivation and try to understand it, to trace its roots, because it is certainly interesting and multifaceted - like everything in this person.
Let him not justify his actions. Despite the fact that I touch the motivation and intentions in the biography paragraph, remember that we will think about it in detail in the part dedicated to motivation, goals, and why everything happened like that. That's all! According to the following events, the root, experiments in Konoha, Akatski, we will run in the second part of the biography paragraph, which will be released in a few days.
In order not to miss it, you can subscribe to the newsletter. If you liked the article, you can support me financially by any amount here. See you!